Theodicius

Good. Evil. Bratwurst.

Generalization: I hate the suburbs

Filed under: General,Politics— arlen@ 9:53 am

Well, maybe “hate” is too strong a word. Let’s go for “dislike”; perhaps even “feel contempt for.”

I deal with a mixture of city kids and suburban kids. True, some of the city kids can be a problem. But they don’t hold a candle to the suburban ones. once they learn the rules, most of the city kids I deal with are willing to play within them, and most of the ones who don’t follow the “OK, guv, it’s a fair cop,” school from the english cozies. The kids from the suburbs, however, don’t think they did anything wrong unless they’re caught, and when caught spend the next hours/days/weeks/months whining about how nasty you were to catch them in the first place, and not simply overlook the infraction because they’re such angelic children.

Case in point (names and other identifiers excluded): In chess there are some rules that you either call on yourself, or can only be enforced if your opponent catches you at it and appeals to the director. A suburban child breaks such a rule. After the game is over, I suggest to him, politely, that he should learn the rules of the game if he plans to continue playing in tournaments. (I do this for his own good, because there are some folks who play chess who can get very outraged — and outrageous — if you transgress the rules while playing against them. They probably wouldn’t break your fingers over it; at least they haven’t yet.) Indignantly, he tells me he knows the rules. Further, he obviously didn’t do anything wrong, because his opponent didn’t complain.

OK, I can see trying to get away with breaking the rules, especially if, as in his case, he was going to lose if he didn’t break the rules. I can see trying it, although I can’t condone it (and if one of my players tried it on, he wouldn’t be one of my players for very long). But to stand there and claim there was nothing at all wrong with what he did? You’ll only find that attitude in the suburbs, dear. City kids would at least be embarassed about trying it.

Cities can be rough, I’m not trying to dispute that. But there’s an honesty, a forthrightness, in the roughness that I’ve grown to appreciate. Yes, life in the city can be mean, but the meanness is right out there in the open, not trying to disguise itself.

It’s in the soul-stealing suburbs that your friends get pulled over for DWB. (Driving While Black, for those of you who may be naive about things like that. It a suburban road hazard every black male has to deal with, especially after dark. If you’re behind the wheel of the car, and dark-skinned, you must be Up To No Good.) Where the kids can, with deliberate intent, break the rules and then be amazed that a simple “Sorry” doesn’t wipe the offense out completely. Where actions and words are not allowed to have consequences. Where we just can’t admit anything happens, where we hide all transgressions under a flood of money. Oh, some misdeeds surface despite all the efforts to hide them, but they’re just the visible tip of the iceberg. I’ve lived in small towns, large cities, and suburbs. I’ve faced power-take-off shafts and guns. I’ve no intention of ever living in a suburb again. Those people are scary.

I’ll leave you with the thoughts of the Great Detective Himself:

“You look at these scattered houses, and you are impressed by their beauty. I look at them, and the only thought which comes to me is a feeling of their isolation and of the impunity with which crime may be committed there… They always fill me with a certain horror. It is my belief, Watson, founded upon my experience, that the lowest and vilest alleys in London do not present a more dreadful record of sin…”

“But the reason is very obvious. The pressure of public opinion can do in the town what the law cannot accomplish. There is no lane so vile that the scream of a tortured child, or the thud of a drunkard’s blow, does not beget sympathy and indignation among the neighbours, and then the whole machinery of justice is ever so close that a word of complaint can set it going, and there is but a step between the crime and the dock. But look at these lonely houses, …. Think of the deeds of hellish cruelty, the hidden wickedness which may go on, year in, year out, in such places, and none the wiser. Had this lady who appeals to us for help gone to live in Winchester, I should never have had a fear for her. It is the five miles of country which makes the danger.”

Radio’s Talking Heads are happy

Filed under: General,Politics— arlen@ 9:18 am

Local Talk Radio mavens are happy: For weeks (months) they’ve been howling with rage because our local police force hadn’t arrested someone for slashing some Republican tires on election eve. Even though no evidence whatsoever was brought forward in support of the claim, it was trumpeted as Siginificant Vote Tampering, rather than simple vandalism.

One could ask where the voices of outrage were over the failure to make arrests for the dozens of rapes and other serious crimes that went unsolved. If mentioned at all, they didn’t get even 10% of the airtime that this vandalism got. For that matter (to compare apples to apples) what about all the slashed tires that happened in the wake of the 100th Harley celebration? Guess it only matters when the victims are Republicans.

Time

Filed under: General— arlen@ 9:04 am

The older I get, the faster time seems to pass. Why is that, do you think? Is it because as the pile of minutes behind me grows, each new minute that arrives represents an ever-decreasing fraction of my life? When I was 10, the next year represented 10% of my life. When I was 50, it represented only 2%.

In the past, when I set something down to return to it later, “later” was only a few hours, maybe a day or two. Now it’s often a week or more. Yet the subjective feeling is that the same amount of time has passed.

Time remains a mystery.

In Defence of Books

Filed under: General— arlen@ 11:46 am

Within sight of my desk is an abundance of printed matter. Including magazines, a conservative estimate is a bit over 3000 items. Limit the count solely to books, and we’re still talking around 2000. There are floor-to-ceiling shelves on two walls, with three other free-standing shelves, plus a double-decker closet shelf. (I have a button with the motto: “Of course you’re out of book space. Everyone’s out of book space. If you’re not out of book space, you’re probably not worth knowing.”) Since the question “Why so many?” is heard often from non-book people, I thought I’d set out some reasons.

1) They serve notice on visitors. This is probably the least important reason to have books, but it’s still useful. If you walk into someone’s home and see books, check out the authors and subjects. They tell you something immeditely about the owner. If you see lots of paperbacks, the owner likes to read for entertainment. If the books are hardcover bestsellers, the person is impatient. If you see hardcovers laying on their sides on shelves (more than just the one or two the owner might currently be reading) rather than standing up, You know the owner is Faking It. No one who cares about books would do that. In addition, if those piles are artfully arranged on multiple shelves, the owner is anathema, a believer in Book As Art Object, and you should make a polite excuse and leave as quickly as possible, never to return. True Believers in the printed word do not associate with that ilk.

2) They’re cheap travel. Histories and biographies can take you to places and times you will never be able to visit, for less than the cheapest airfare, and you don’t even need to pack.

3) Unlike real people, many of the characters you meet in books are intentionally likable. This means you’ll associate with a much better class of people in a book than outside of one. These people can also show you how to behave yourself; while your friends can only serve as Bad Examples, the characters in good books can serve as positive examples.

4) They stretch your mind. Most people associate with like-minded folks. This is human nature, to want to be around more of Our Kind. But a book is a great way to explore a different point of view, to see life through different eyes. You can invite an author into your house to preach, pontificate, or simply propose and you will not incur any further social obligations. You can stretch your mind by trying to wrap it around new ideas. To quote Oliver Wendell Holmes, “A mind, once stretched by a new idea, never quite returns to its former shape.” Books are dangerous that way, good ones will change you. But change is good. No human is ever 100% accurate; everyone (including yours truly) is wrong about something; the only way to reduce that amount is to be exposed to other views.

5) Books are “off-line storage.” They can serve are references for both data and opinion. The Internet is gaining on the Library as repository for fact (once you acquire the skill of sorting out the crap; too many people still believe that if it’s on the ‘net, it must be true) but it still lags as far as opinion goes. If I want to know what Alexander Alekhine thinks of 3 Nc3 in the Slav (chess reference, if you don’t know chess, just pass on by) I won’t find it on the net. But I will find a nice article on it written by him in a book. And if the rodent-worshippers down by Orlando have their way, that will continue to be the only way for me to find anyone’s opinion published after 1932. And that’s important, because while access to data is essential for forming a good opinion, it’s also essential to see what other intelligent people have made of that data. “If I see farther than those who came before me,” said Isaac Newton, “it is because I stand on the shoulders of giants.” Only a fool would reject out of hand the chance to learn from the great minds which have already tackled an issue. The previous thinkers can be wrong about the data, unquestionably; keep that firmly in mind. But even if wrong, their views will help strengthen your own, “just as iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another” (Proverbs 27:17).

Yes, I have a lot of books. I’ve sold to used book stores over twice as many books as I have, and the turnover continues. I have a few hundred right now in a box waiting for the next trip to the used book store. (In addition to “normal” turnover, I just cleared off 7+ linear feet of shelf space this morning, to make room for other books stacked around the room). I will continue to have a lot of books (as long as you define “a lot” as “more than 1000”) for the forseeable future. Some I need for reference, some are part of specific collections (such as chess biographies, or Sherlock Holmes) and some are, quite simply, friends.

Excuse me. I have to go. With a few more volumes I “could just fill that gap on the second shelf. It looks untidy.”

(That final quote is offered in honor of a departed friend, Al Kovacic. I was holding it together at his funeral rather well, until I encountered the Complete Sherlock Holmes on the memorial table. The quote is, of course, from “The Adventure of the Empty House,” but, unlike Mr Holmes, Al will not return from his particular Reichenbach. Still, whenever I return to Baker Street of 1895, I’ll feel his presence there, and that’s something.)

Progress Report

Filed under: General— arlen@ 9:52 am

OK, so I gave in and tried it One More Time. I succumbed to the temptation, after a little encouragement from Saint Hellen herself.

Desk surface 60% clear which, given a 17″ monitor, two (non-tower) computers, a printer/scanner, and a day planner is about all I figure is realistic to expect. Floor surface 50%+, and only one step to my desk now requirs any sort of extra care.

Summary: Progress is slow but visible. But then this is early days, and the “hump” has not yet arrived. Still I am optimistic.

December 2025
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031