Theodicius

Good. Evil. Bratwurst.

Customer Disservice, Pt 2

Filed under: General,Web Design— arlen@ 11:36 am

OK, this time I’ll give URL’s, because the sites promise to be helpful, they just apparently hate the equipment I’m using. I’m having repairs done to my car, at the moment, which will take it out of action for a couple of weeks. So I need to look for a temporary, and perhaps permanent, replacement.

Dollar Rent A Car has a front page that apparently lets you select the day you want to pick up your rental car. Unless, of course, you’re using Safari. Click on the little calendar image which pops up the current month’s calendar to choose the date, and you’ll see only the first week, no more. If you don’t want to pick the car up until the 14th of the month, you’re out of luck.

Oh, wait, there’s a field containing the date. But don’t be silly and expect to be able type anything into the field. Sorry Charlie, you have to use the little calendar widget. Sorry Dollar, I’m renting from someone else.

Did I want to repair or replace the car? Well, let’s see. I pull up the website for Don Jacobs Subaru to see if I can afford a new Outback. Right there in front of me is a button saying “Build Your Vehicle, Name Your Price”. Ooooh, that sounds tasty. Click. A new window opens with a pretty lady telling me to click the start button, and she’ll come back when I’m ready to talk about price. Click. Nothing. Click harder. Still nothing.

The click/no response continues whether I use Safari or IE5. I know, I’ll fire up Firefox. Click. Crash! Another incident report for Talkback. Sorry, Don, old thing. I’m off to another dealer, one with a website that might actually work (novel concept, that).

Basic site testing should have uncovered both of those glitches, but apparently they didn’t bother with something as silly as checking their work. My mother always uses the same word to describe people who consistently refuse to check their work. “Slipshod.”

Test, my children. Don’t put a whiz-bang in the design until you know it works.

Customer Disservice, Pt 1

Filed under: General,Web Design— arlen@ 11:18 am

Went looking for a light bulb. Oh, not just any light bulb, but a dimmable compact flourescent. Yes, they exist, despite the fact that everyone up to and including Home Depot tells me they don’t. I know they exist, because I have one, and I want more.

So I find that GE makes one, and I get their list of possible places to buy them. I’ve already tried the over-the-counter places, so I check the web vendors they list.

ARRRGH! It’s really not possible for me to find out. I’m looking for “GE Soft White Dimmable Light Bulb”, which is the only description GE’s website gives for the bulb. So I go to Bulb Man, Bulb Direct and Specialty Bulb. (No links for you, crappy websites all!) All the bulbs are listed only by part number! No description, not even a manufacturer name. Just part numbers! I don’t have a part number, you moronic website! I just know the name of the bulb I want!!

All three of these vendors have lost my business, simply because they didn’t have a clue about how to deal with a customer. I would have purchased a case of those bulbs, at least, considering I can’t find them in any store within 50 miles of my house. But their websites were too stupid to help me find what I was after.

The Storal of my mory is this, my children: When you’re building a website that expects to sell things to people who are not experts in the field, give them more than one way of locating your wares. Had any of those sites allowed me to find the bulb by name, they would have had my credit card number within seconds. Heck, if they’d even included a single sentence of description of the bulbs, without making me click individually on eleventy-one part numbers in a vain hope of finding what I wanted, it would have made the sale. But noooo. It’s just part numbers for you; if you want more, you’re going to have to beg and wait. I’m in the middle of a basement redesign, and I don’t need to spend a lot of time searching for light bulbs; I want them now.

As it is, I’ll go on back to one of the local suppliers and special order a case or two (so that I can have replacements when these burn out, considering how hard they are to find). Am I likely to go back to those web sites? Not very. Their URL’s are indelibly associated with the frustration I felt, so why would I want to go back for another helping of it?

It only takes a little ignorance to lose a customer for life.

Ain’t deadlines Grand?

Filed under: General— arlen@ 10:54 am

As Douglas Adams once said, “I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.”

Sorry about the absence. Had my head down for a while.

Funerals are Fatal

Filed under: Books,General— arlen@ 3:44 pm

At least that’s what it seems. Hercule Poirot is called in when a chance remark at a funeral may have resulted in a murder.

This is from the period where Christie decided to abandon all pretense of examining clues. Poirot solves it by apparently sitting in a room and listening to people talk. This book contains one of my favorite observations by Poirot: people cannot stand silence; they will talk, and the more they talk the more likely they are to give themselves away. How many real-life crimes are solved simply because the guilty person talked about the deed too much?

The Sea is Dead, but the Scrolls Aren’t

Filed under: Books,General,Religion,Theology— arlen@ 10:37 am

It’s amusing sometimes, to see what lengths people go to in order to attack things they don’t believe in. In the case of Christianity, they often use strange interpretations of the Dead Sea Scrolls. You remember them? They were found near the ruins of Qumran, and there has been a project going since the late 40’s attempting to date them and translate them.

Anyway, the usual tactic I’ve run into is to assert they say things which they don’t, or to make other, similarly unsupported, speculations about the community of Essenes (for example, I’ve run into folks who proudly assert the Essenes were Christians, or were a sect which followed “True Christianity” — the intent of the last assertion is, of course, to support a claim that all current Christian sects are therefore false). Those who make arguments based upon these assertions manage to shut up their targets, not through the force of Truth, but in the main because the average Christian is notoriously uninformed about Christian history, often accepting rather bizarre revisions of history as fact simply through ignorance. (My daughter’s Advanced Placement European History teacher once stated baldly that the major difference of opinion between Martin Luther and John Calvin was that Martin Luther believed in free will while Calvin didn’t. We went out and bought my daughter an independent study guide for the AP European History exam, so the teacher’s ignorance didn’t hurt her. We’d both learned quite a bit earlier that pointing out errors to this teacher led only to reprisals, not truth, so there was no point in trying to educate the teacher.)

This is a rather long way round to introducing one of my current study topics, the Dead Sea Scrolls. The book is The Meaning Of The Dead Sea Scrolls by James Vanderkam and Peter Flint. It’s an excellent introduction to the scrolls themselves (the current “official” translation of the scrolls runs to 39 volumes; the nasty part of me thinks this is why they’re such fertile ground for fabrication — it’s not likely anyone you’re talking to has read them all). But more importantly, from my standpoint, is they tell the history of the project to translate the scrolls, and debunk a lot of the myths that have arisen around them.

The myths grew in part because of the speed (lack thereof) of publication. Many things slowed the pace of the scholarship, but to speculators outside the only real reason was that there must be something in the scrolls that would completely destroy the orthodoxy of the day, either Christian or Jewish (speculation on the latter rose sharply when Israel wrested control of the scrolls from Jordan after the Six-Day War). I mean it’s obvious that must be the reason for the delay — it can’t be because the work is difficult, or because there are so many things exploding around the scholars that it’s hard to remain there on the job, or any one of a hundred other, more innocuous reasons. It’s human nature to leap to the most malignant reason behind someone’s behavior.

This is a highly recommended read for anyone wanting to know something more (or just something, even) about the discoveries in Qumran. The authors have written a very approachable introduction to a very complex and important subject.

December 2025
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031